Legal Opinion
Timberlane Lumber Company v. Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 27, 1984No. 83-2008PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
In this antitrust action, Timberlane Lumber Company (Timberlane) alleged that Bank of America, its officers, and other individuals conspired to prevent Timberlane from milling lumber in Honduras and exporting it to the United States. The suit was consolidated with three independent tort actions brought by Timberlane employees for individual injuries suffered during the alleged illegal conduct. The district court dismissed the antitrust action under the act of state doctrine and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The consolidated tort actions were dismissed under the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Joseph Rae v. Union Bank, a Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Cheng v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas & Oil Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Susan Mary Kamen v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., Patricia McDonald and Carol BuckhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Norma J. Nesbit v. Gears Unlimited, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Victoria Rosales Jesus Rosales Rebecca Rosales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Filetech S.A. v. France Telecom S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.