Legal Opinion

Ryder v. Union Pacific Railroad

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided May 4, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 15-431-SDD-EWDPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF THE LOCOMOTIVE VIDEO WITHOUT A CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT OR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND UNION PACIFIC’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING LOCOMOTIVE VIDEOS

ERIN WILDER-DOOMES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before the court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of the Locomotive Video without a Confidentiality Agreement or Pro*187tective Order (the “Motion to Compel”)1 and Union Pacific Railroad Company’s and Union Pacific Corporation’s (collectively, “Union Pacific”) Motion for Protective Order Regarding Locomotive Videos (the “Motion for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

In Re Terra International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
Jacqueline M. Harris, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
Pincheira v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
Patterson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Zabin v. Burlington Stores Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2019