State v. Morrow

Fain, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Ronald E. Morrow appeals from his convictions and sentences for violating R.C. 943.14(B) (record keeping and inspection for livestock dealers) and 953.25(A) (disposal requirements for rendering plants). He contends that the trial court erred in permitting a livestock dealers license to be admitted into evidence and that the trial court erred in its application and interpretation of both R.C. 943.14(B) and 953.25(A).

We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the license. We further find that the trial court correctly applied and…