Legal Opinion

Steinhardt v. Potter

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 27, 2004No. 00 Civ. 8538(PKC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CASTEL, District Judge.

The defendant John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United States, moves to strike plaintiffs’ jury demand in an action brought against him in his official capacity under the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., (“FMLA”). For the reasons explained below, I conclude that, for the purposes of assessing sovereign immunity, the suit against defendant is a suit against the United States, and that the government has not waived that aspect of sovereign immunity that would permit a FMLA claim against it to be tried before a jury.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lorillard v. PonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Nevada Department of Human Resources v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Bina Buford v. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., in His Official Capacity as Postmaster General of the United States Postal ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bonzani v. ShinsekiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
  2. Jackson v. North Caddo Hospital Service DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2024
  3. Tina Lee v. State of Iowa and Polk County Clerk of CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. Tina Lee v. State of Iowa and Polk County Clerk of CourtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  5. Vick v. DejoyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API