Meyers v. Lux
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, P. J.
Plaintiffs brought this' action to enjoin construction by defendants as directors of the Cherry-Todd Electric Cooperative, Inc. of an office building in Valentine, Nebraska, and for other relief. A temporary injunction was granted and after trial the court rendered and entered judgment enjoining defendants from maintaining the principal place of business in Valentine and the erecting of the proposed office building and also requiring *184them forthwith to issue to the plaintiff Wise a membership certificate in the cooperative. From the judgment, an appeal has been taken to this court by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. WillsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1914
- People ex rel. Knickerbocker Press v. BarkerNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- Porterfield v. Black Bill & Doney Parks Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Mullen v. Northern Accident Ins.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Sagness v. Farmers Co-Operative Creamery Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Application of Trico Electric Cooperative, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Brennan v. Minneapolis Society for the Blind, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Smith v. Otter Tail Power CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- J. J. Harris & Co. v. BrownerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
- Meyers v. LuxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.