Legal Opinion

Deaver v. . Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1896PublishedCited by 13 opinions

. AotioN to recover land, tried before Boykin,

1Opinion of the Court

Avert, J.:

The court instructed the jury that when a grant is located by contemporaneous marked lines those contemporaneous marked lines govern and control its bonudary and fix the location so as to supersede other descriptions. We see no merit in the exception to this as a legal proposition. A deed is a contract, and the highest evidence of the identity of the subject-matter of it, where there is conflicting testimony as to its true location, is proof of the consent of two minds that certain marked lines or corners should constitute the boundary. Shaffer v. Gaynor, 117 N. C., 15 ; Shultz v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Shaffer v. GaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Baxter v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Falls of Neuse Manufacturing Co. v. HendricksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Murray v. . SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Westfelt v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  2. Bowen v. . GaylordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Taylor v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Cornelison v. . HammondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Allison v. KenionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API