Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Ertl

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 20, 1961No. 18574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hall

This action was instituted by Ertl under Rule 105, R.C.P. Colo., to determine interests in sixty-seven unpatented placer mining claims located in Rio Blanco County, Colorado. The claims were known as the Pueblo Group, Cedar Group, Nancy Group and Helen Agnes Group.

Trial was to the court and judgment entered December 2, 1957, quieting title in Ertl to all claims. The defendants who appeared in the trial court are here by writ of error seeking reversal.

Several parties named as defendants in the trial court did not appear there — among others, Cathedral Bluffs Realty Trust, herein referred to as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simson v. LangholfSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  2. Scott v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hickel v. Oil Shale Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Oil Shale Corporation v. UdallDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966
  3. Hamilton v. ErtlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API