Legal Opinion

Loutre Land & Timber Co. v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 10, 2011No. 2010-C-2327PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Justice.

hWe granted certiorari to determine whether the court of appeal erred in reversing the trial court’s judgment and in recognizing the defendant as the owner of a disputed tract of property. For the reasons that follow, we find the laws on acquisitive prescription require reversal of the court of appeal’s ruling, and we remand for the determination of issues pre-termitted on appeal.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The instant litigation involves a dispute over a tract of land that lies between two contiguous pieces of property that are owned by two separate owners. The Marie Wilson…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. WoodLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Marks v. Zimmerman Farms, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Loutre Land and Timber Co. v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Loutre Land and Timber Co. v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. LOUTRE LAND AND TIMBER COMPANY v. RobertsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hooper v. Hero Lands Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. EOG Resources, Inc. v. HopkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Jackson v. HerringLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Taylor v. DumasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. LOUTRE LAND AND TIMBER CO. v. RobertsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API