Legal Opinion

Mieteika v. Minderman

New York County Courts

Decided May 15, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to set aside an order requiring plaintiff to give security for costs.

1Opinion of the CourtGibbs, J.

On or about January 6, 1922, an order was entered in this action requiring the plaintiff to give security for costs on the ground that plaintiff was a non-resident of Bronx county. Thereafter, in compliance with the order, an undertaking was approved by this court and filed. Plaintiff has since moved into the county of Bronx and now seeks to vacate and set aside the order requiring him to file security for costs.

Section 1522 of the Civil Practice Act provides as follows:

“ The defendant in an action brought in a court of record may require security for costs to be given:
“ A. Where the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ambler v. AmblerNew York Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. G.C.S. Co. v. Aresco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Sanchez v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API