Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIrwin D. Davidson, J.

Motion originally referred to Hon. Irving H. Saypol is recalled. Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the ex parte order of Justice Saypol which required security for costs be deposited by a nonresident plaintiff is denied. Plaintiff submits an affidavit that he is now a resident of New York. Section 1522 of the Civil Practice Act provides for security for costs where plaintiff, when the action was commenced, was a person residing without the State. The fact that subsequent to the commencement of the action plaintiff becomes a resident of the State does not entitle him to have the order vacated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mieteika v. Minderman, New York County Courts1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. G.C.S. Co. v. Aresco, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. G.C.S. Co. v. Aresco, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API