Legal Opinion

El-Ha'Kim v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 21, 1983No. Appeal, No. 3110 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

Before this Court is an appeal by Jamal Abdul ElHa’Kim (Petitioner) from a decision and order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming a referee’s denial of his Review Petition. We affirm.

Petitioner incurred an injury in the course of his employment with the Sharon Steel Corp. on February 7, 1978. Workmen’s compensation benefits were paid to Petitioner, but said payments were suspended pursuant to a .Supplemental Agreement enter ed into in December of 1980. On March 26,1981, Petitioner filed the Review Petition which is the focus of the instant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCloskey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. A.M. Skier Agency, Inc. v. Pocono Futures, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Port Authority v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Boyce v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API