Simmons v. Mark Lift Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Dissent
Justice BURNETT:
Because I believe the mechanical application of the factors recited in Brown v. American Ry. Express Co., 128 S.C. 428, 123 S.E. 97 (1924) without considering the facts which may support a finding of a consolidation, merger or continuation of the predecessor entity result in an injustice to the consumer, I respectfully dissent, in part.
*314The facts set forth by the district court and the majority reveal that Plaintiff Simmons alleges he was injured by the collapse of an elevated scissorlift aerial work platform manufactured in 1990 by the predecessor corporation, Mark Industries,…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.