Claim of Bey v. Aramark Healthcare Support Services, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 24, 2004, which ruled that claimant was not discriminated against by the employer in violation of Workers’ Compensation Law § 120.
Following claimant’s failure to provide the employer with medical documentation regarding his absence from work, his employment was terminated. Approximately six months later, claimant filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits, alleging that it was a work-related injury that had kept him from work. After another six months elapsed, claimant filed a discrimination complaint against the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gibson v. Carrier Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Schroeter v. Grand Hyatt HotelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Lawrik v. Superior Confections, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Sacco v. Mast Advertising/PublishingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Claim of Little v. Gaines Electrical Contracting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Gallo v. Jamaica Towing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006