Legal Opinion

City of Miltonvale v. Lanoue

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from, Cloud District Court.—Original Proceedings in Habeas Corpus. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

Two cases, arising substantially out of the same facts, have been presented to this court. It appears that on February 12, 1885, a prosecution was commenced before the police judge of the city of Miltonvale, a city of the third class in Cloud county, in the name of the city, and . against S. C. Lanoue, for an alleged violation of a city ordinance prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors. The com*604plaint contained two counts. The defendant was tried and convicted on both counts, aqd afterward appealed to the district court, where he was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re BoydSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. State v. VolmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. Franlin v. WestfallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  4. In re ChambersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Banking Co. v. VealeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. In re John W. for a writ of Habeas CorpusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API