Legal Opinion

Franlin v. Westfall

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Original Proceedings in Habeas Corpus. Petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed in this court by Willis Jackson, February 24th, 1882. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion herein.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus, in which the plaintiff, Willis Franklin, charges the defendant, Thomas F. Westfall, with illegally restraining the plaintiff of his liberty, and asking that' he may be released by this court.

From the meager statement of the facts of the case in the pleadings, and the few additional facts as shown by the evidence, the facts of the case, with the questions of law involved, seem to be substantially as follows: On June 8, 1877, the city of Ottawa, a city of the second class, passed an ordinance…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Kansas City v. HenreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Hill v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  3. In re NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. In re BlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  5. Plasters v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API