Legal Opinion

People v. Neuman

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*325OPINION OF THE COURT

Duncan S. McNab, J.

Back on March 18, 1977, this court dismissed Indictment No. 76-00905-02, against defendant Loretta Neuman, on grounds of legally insufficient evidence, with leave to the office of the Special Prosecutor to apply for resubmission within 10 days of that decision. On that same day, this court also dismissed that same indictment, with leave to resubmit, as to defendant’s husband and codefendant, Dr. Carl Neuman, as well as Indictment No. 76-00906-01, based not on insufficient evidence, but rather, for improper comment and inadequate legal instruction at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Hynes v. KarassikNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Landau v. HynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. In re Grand Jury SubpoenasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Hynes v. KarassikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Penfield v. VenutiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1981
  2. People v. DoeNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. WhiteNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. LesterNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  5. People v. NicholasWatertown City Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API