Legal Opinion

Penfield v. Venuti

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 8, 1981No. Civ. No. H-81-307PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS AND OBJECTIONS

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, District Judge:

INTRODUCTION

This motion requires the court to construe the Connecticut criminal records erasure law, Connecticut General Statutes (“C.G.S.”) § 54-142a. In particular, the court must determine the extent to which records and other evidence arguably “erased” under that statute, because of the dismissal of charges against a defendant in criminal proceedings, are discoverable in civil litigation pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff, a citizen of Massachusetts, has brought this action against two…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte S.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  2. Laney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  3. Penfield v. VenutiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
  4. Malatesta v. New York State Division of State PoliceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
  5. Ex Parte SC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API