Penfield v. Venuti
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PENDING MOTIONS AND OBJECTIONS
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, District Judge:
INTRODUCTION
This motion requires the court to construe the Connecticut criminal records erasure law, Connecticut General Statutes (“C.G.S.”) § 54-142a. In particular, the court must determine the extent to which records and other evidence arguably “erased” under that statute, because of the dismissal of charges against a defendant in criminal proceedings, are discoverable in civil litigation pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Plaintiff, a citizen of Massachusetts, has brought this action against two…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ex Parte S.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
- Laney v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Penfield v. VenutiDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Malatesta v. New York State Division of State PoliceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Ex Parte SC, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009