Foote v. Bruggerhoff
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Kings county. Action by Jirah I. Foote against Lucy R. Bruggerhoff and others. From a judgment directing plaintiffs to convey the homestead to defendants, and dismissing a counterclaim, both parties appeal. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtCullen, J.
There has been, and still is, another litigation between these parties in this court pending in the city and county of New York. An appeal from an interlocutory judgment in that case was taken to the general term of the First department. In the report of the decision on that appeal (66 Hun, 406, 21 N. Y. Supp. 509) there is so full a statement of the controversy between the parties, and the facts out of which the controversy sprung, as to require us to state now only the particular points involved in this action. After the decision of the general term in the New York action, the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hetzel v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Prentice v. . JanssenNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Garvey v. . McDevittNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Groshon v. LyonNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Foote v. BruggerhofNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gould v. GouldNew York Supreme Court · 1919
- Gould v. GouldNew York Supreme Court · 1922