Legal Opinion

People v. Scott

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 2009No. C059703PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTZ, J.

In 1998, defendant Harrison Scott was convicted of robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) 1 and carjacking (§ 215, subd. (a)) arising out of the same facts. Both of those convictions are alleged as prior strikes in the instant case, and defendant contends one of them must be stricken.

In People v. Burgos (2004) 117 Cal.App.4th 1209 [12 Cal.Rptr.3d 566] (Burgos), Division Two of the Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, discussed this issue. We find the holding in Burgos difficult to discern. It can reasonably be read to state that in such cases one strike must be stricken, or that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. CarmonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. VargasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. United States v. Velasquez-BosqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. People v. FinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. The People v. Stark CA5California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API