Legal Opinion
Rappeport v. Patten
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 18, 1941No. 6276PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By alleging that defendant, Tom C. Patten, is a nonresident of Louisiana, in the petition of this suit instituted on May 17, 1940, for the purpose of recovering judgment on an asserted indebtedness, plaintiff, E.W. Rappeport, obtained a writ of attachment; and thereunder, through garnishment process, certain rights and credits belonging to the former were seized.
A motion to dissolve the writ was timely filed by the defendant, in which he traverses the petition's allegations and avers his residence and home to be Shreveport, Caddo Parish, Louisiana. Additionally, he claims damages resulting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Succession of SimmonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Texana Oil & Refining Co. v. BelchicSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- First Nat. Bank v. HintonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- First Nat. Bank of Shreveport v. PiersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re KennedyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- LaFleur v. Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Bell v. MilsakDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1952
- Clarke v. PattonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
- Dealers Building Material Supply Co. v. CampbellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.