Legal Opinion

Bell v. Milsak

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided August 18, 1952No. Civ. A. 3429PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

This is a suit in tort in which jurisdiction depends upon diversity, and defendant has moved to dismiss on the ground that both parties are citizens of Louisiana.

Young Milsak, in the Fall of 1949, when nineteen years of age, entered Louisiana Polytechnic Institute at Ruston, Louisiana, as a student. At the time his home was with his father and mother in the State of New York, and he was received as an out-of-state student, and as such, paid some $100 a year *220extra fees not required of those residing in the state. Early in 1951, when he had become twenty-one years of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Succession of SimmonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. Rappeport v. PattenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. McHaney v. CunninghamDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1925
  4. State ex rel. Fleming v. JoyceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  5. Hornung v. MillsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. OlivaDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968
  2. Jean Paul Mas and Judy Mas v. Oliver H. Perry, No. 73-3008 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, PartiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. District of Columbia v. Dorothy K. StackhouseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. Dunlap Ex Rel. Wells v. BuchananDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1983
  5. Pauley v. PauleyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API