Janco v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Arnold, J.,
Plaintiff brought this action of assumpsit as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy issued by the defendant, and the plaintiff’s statement averred, inter alia, the death of the insured, and attached a copy of the policy. The defendant denied liability upon the sole ground of exclusion clauses attached to the policy. This was an affirmative defense: 46 C. J. S. Insurance §1297 (b), page 354. The facts upon which it was based were correctly set up as “New Matter”. The plaintiff filed a reply admitting these facts and the defendant moved for judgment, alleging that but…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Arabian American Oil Co. v. Kirby & Kirby, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Saxe v. FEINSTEINSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Goldenberg v. Village of CapitanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Gordon v. Eureka Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Grimes v. New York Life Ins.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.