Legal Opinion

People v. Obrochta

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 18, 1986No. 85-0556, 85-0660 consPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reinhard

Defendants, Frank Obrochta and Paul Koroluk, were charged by indictment with the offenses of burglary (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 19 — 1(a)), possession of burglary tools (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 19 — 2(a)), and theft exceeding $300 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 38, par. 16 — 1(a)(1)). Following a jury trial, Obrochta was found guilty of all three offenses, and Koroluk was found guilty of burglary and possession of burglary tools. The trial court had previously directed a finding of not guilty for Koroluk on the theft charge and had directed findings of not guilty for a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. DixonIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. BartallIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. HousbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. ScottIllinois Supreme Court · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. RuddAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  2. People v. RodriquezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  3. People v. WalnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. People v. CampbellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API