Legal Opinion

State v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 6, 1974No. 7426SC594PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendants bring forward numerous assignments of error, all of which apply to both defendants. Defendants first contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion for a continuance made at the start of their trial. The motion was based upon the absence of a defense witness, Jerry McMillan, even though a subpoena had been issued. A motion for a continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge, whose ruling thereon is subject to review only in case of manifest abuse. State v. Penley, 6 N.C. App. 455, 170 S.E. 2d 632 (1969). Defendants have not shown, nor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. PenleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LillyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. BozemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API