Legal Opinion

Romero v. Lone Star Co.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided August 21, 1984No. SA-83-CA-2089PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SESSIONS, Chief Judge.

ON THIS DATE came on to be considered the motion of the Defendant, Lone *2Star Company, to dismiss and for summary judgment.

Summary judgment is appropriate only if “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(c); see Impossible Electronic Techniques, Inc. v. Wackenhut Protective Systems, Inc., 669 F.2d 1026, 1030 (5th Cir.1982). The party seeking summary judgment bears the exacting burden of demonstrating that there is no actual dispute as to any material fact in the case.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Impossible Electronics Techniques, Inc. v. Wackenhut Protective Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Luna v. North Star Dodge Sales, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Financial General Bankshares, Inc. v. Eugene J. Metzger, Financial General Bankshares, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Eugene J. MetzgerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re: Sk Foods, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Miller v. Plex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API