City of Richland v. Franklin County Boundary Review Board
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.
The City of Richland appeals from a decision of the Franklin County Boundary Review Board (Board) approving the City of Pasco's application to annex 4,500 acres of unincorporated territory. Richland contends that the Board's decision should be reversed because it erred in accepting into evidence an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that was inadequate as a matter of law, it failed to combine the Richland and Pasco annexation hearings and it decided to approve the Pasco proposal without finding that it satisfied the relevant statutory criteria. It further argues that the trial court erred…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cathcart-Maltby-Clearview Community Council v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1981
- Cheney v. City of Mountlake TerraceWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Bellevue v. King County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 9 v. Spokane County Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Mentor v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- King County v. Washington State Boundary Review BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- SEAPC v. Cammack II OrchardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Snohomish County v. HindsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- City of Moses Lake v. Grant CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Town of Ruston v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.