Legal Opinion

State v. Abbott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1976No. 22183, CA 4543PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant was convicted after jury trial of burglary. ORS 164.225. The sole issue on appeal is defendant’s claim of prejudicial misconduct by the prosecuting attorney. Defendant contends that it was reversible error for the trial judge to refuse a mistrial after the prosecutor called defendant’s accomplice, James Morgan, as a witness for the state, knowing that the witness would probably refuse to testify.

Defendant and Morgan, the witness in question, were involved in a burglary in which a small safe and its contents were taken from a residence in the Valley Junction area in October 1974.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. State v. NelsonOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. BrooksHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AbbottOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API