Legal Opinion

Mizell v. Glover

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 20, 2000No. 3134Published

1Opinion of the Court

339 S.C. 567 (2000)

529 S.E.2d 301

Judy MIZELL and John Mizell, Appellants,

v.

Dr. Alfred L. GLOVER and Alpine Podiatry Center, P.A., Respondents.

No. 3134.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Heard February 8, 2000.

Decided March 20, 2000.

Rehearing Denied May 6, 2000.

Randall M. Eason, of Lancaster; and Gilbert Scott Bagnell, of Columbia, for Appellants.

Montieth P. Todd, of Sowell, Todd, Laffitte, Beard & Watson, of Columbia, for Respondents.

GOOLSBY, Judge:

John and Judy Mizell brought this medical malpractice action against Dr. Alfred L. Glover, a podiatrist, and Alpine Podiatry Center, his…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago SudarCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. United States v. Benjamin F. Gay Iii, Roy M. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Taylor v. MedenicaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Hawkins v. Greenwood Development Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API