Legal Opinion
Hofmann v. Fermilab Nal/Ura
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 30, 2002No. 01 C 8077PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BUCKLO, District Judge.
This opinion discusses, and I hope ends, a long-standing dispute that the plaintiff, now acting pro se, has had with her former employer and everyone involved in any way, as well as some persons or entities 'not even remotely involved in the matter.
In 1989, I.M. Hofmann filed charges with the Illinois Department of Human Rights against her employer, Universities Research Association (“URA”), alleging sex and disability discrimination. She was fired in 1990, and subsequently amended her complaint to include, in addition, claims of harassment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James ElliotCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Edward Bontkowski v. First National Bank of CiceroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bao v. MemberSelect Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Harrison v. CrickDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020
- Kelly v. First Data CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020