Ouellette v. Special Recreation Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 GAYLA OUELLETTE; LOREN ) Case No.: 3:20-cv-00391-RCJ-WGC OUELLETTE, ) ) 9 ) Plaintiffs, ) 10 ) Order vs. ) ) 11 ) SPECIAL RECREATION SERVICES, INC., ) 12 et al., ) ) 13 Defendants. ) ) ) 14 15 Pro se plaintiffs brings ten claims; eight of which have been dismissed with prejudice by a 16 state court. The state court case is still proceeding on Defendants’ claims against Plaintiffs. The 17 Court therefore dismisses this case under the Colorado-River abstention doctrine. 18 FACTUAL BACKGROUND 19 Plaintiffs are husband and wife. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- American International Underwriters, (Philippines), Inc., a Philippines Corporation v. The Continental Insurance Company, a New Hampshire CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Avi Nakash, Joe Nakash, and Ralph Nakash v. Georges Marciano, Maurice Marciano, Armand Marciano, Paul MarcianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.