Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hamrick v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 11, 1964No. 6 Div. 748PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

This is an appeal by defendant from judgment for plaintiff for personal injury and automobile damage sustained by plaintiff as result of automobile collision.

Motion to quash.

Defendant assigns as error the action of the court in overruling defendant’s motion to quash the service of summons and complaint, which service was made on the secretary of state as agent of defendant pursuant to Act No. 415, approved November 13, 1959, 1959 Acts of Alabama, page 1102; which appears as § 199(}/¿), Title 7, 1963 Pocket Part, Code of Alabama Recompiled 1958.

The collision occurred March 18,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ray v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. RattraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. City of Bessemer v. ClowdusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Childs v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  5. Wages v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Bessemer v. McClainSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. State v. the American Tobacco CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Holmes v. CookCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  4. Jordan v. Reliable Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Burton Mfg. Co., Inc. v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API