Commonwealth v. Jones
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge:
This is an appeal from judgment of sentence for possession of an instrument of crime, simple assault, and retail theft. Appellant argues that he had ineffective trial counsel in that she failed to preserve for appellate review claims of: (1) insufficient evidence to prove intent for the possession and the retail theft convictions, and (2) excessiveness of sentence. Upon review, we find that the trial court correctly rejected appellant’s arguments. We therefore affirm.
After waiving his right to a jury trial, appellant was tried before the Honorable Joseph D. O’Keefe of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Commonwealth v. HubbardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. MartinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. GriscavageSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GroffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. DickersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Karkut v. Target Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. McMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.