Brady v. Apfel
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS
HEARTFIELD, District Judge.
Pending is plaintiffs “Objections to Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.” The Court reviews de novo the portions of the magistrate judge’s report to which objections are filed. See Koetting v. Thompson, 995 F.2d 37, 40 (5th Cir.1993).
I.Proceedings
The magistrate judge’s report sets forth a detailed chronology of the pertinent facts of this case. (Doekt.# 20.) Plaintiff filed his application for disability benefits on June 22,1992,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Patricia GREENSPAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Quintanilla v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Hill v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Homan v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2000
- Gavin Michael List v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- Morris v. BerryhillDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020