Legal Opinion

Quillen v. Tull

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 20, 1984No. Record 810725PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

Mary Ann Beebe died testate in 1940. Under her will, she directed her executor to sell her real estate and divide the proceeds among specified beneficiaries. Although the executor carried out the mandate of the will as to certain realty, he died without having sold four parcels on Chincoteague Island.

On November 7, 1979, Edward Lunn Tull and Zed Ayres, who together owned approximately a 52 per cent interest in the parcels, filed a bill of complaint in the trial court seeking partition by sale and distribution of the proceeds. Named as defendants were known and unknown parties having interests…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shotwell v. ShotwellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  2. Dalgarno v. BaumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  3. Kerr v. Clinchfield Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  4. Thrasher v. ThrasherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  5. Whitworth v. State Highway CommissionerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Woodlawn Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. White v. PleasantsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
  3. Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  4. Richmond v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  5. De Benveniste v. Aaron Christensen FamilySupreme Court of Virginia · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API