Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Kulana Partners, LLC

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided September 23, 2020No. 1:13-cv-00198Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I WILLIAM R. HANCOCK, individually Case No. 13-cv-00198-DKW-WRP and as trustee of Hancock and Company, Inc., ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT KULANA PARTNERS’ SUPPLEMENTAL Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS; (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT v. FIDELITY’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON KULANA PARTNERS, LLC, et al., THE PLEADINGS; (3) DENYING AS MOOT MOTION TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND; AND (4) Defendants. DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND INTRODUCTION On January 10, 2014, this Court dismissed Plaintiff’s claims as barred by a six-year statute of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API