Legal Opinion

Van Vranken v. Granite County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1907No. 2,390PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Granite County; Geo. B. Winston, Judge. ’ Action by Lucy Yan Yranken against Granite county and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial, they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

This action was brought to determine an adverse claim by the defendant Granite county to an interest in the southwest *429quarter of the southwest quarter of section 24, township 7 north, of range 14 west, situate in said county.

The plaintiff alleges that she is the owner in fee, entitled to the possession, and in possession of said land, and that the defendant county makes a pretended claim to the ownership of an easement for a public road or highway in a strip, one hundred feet wide, extending through the same for about one-third of a mile; that the defendant county is not entitled to any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pennie v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cain v. Gold Mountain Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Schooling v. HarrisburgOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Pollock Mining & Milling Co. v. DavenportMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Oliver v. DoughertyArizona Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Silver's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. McDonnell v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Mascall v. MurrayOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Stokes v. LongMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Haley v. McDermottMontana Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API