Legal Opinion
In re Kim W.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1983PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, for the reasons stated by Justice Arthur Markewich in his dissent at the Appellate Division. In addition we note that the question as to whether periodic court review presently required for children placed in foster homes (Social Services Law, § 392) should be extended to children placed for adoption, is the subject of recent study by at least one legislative commission (see Proposal for Voluntary Foster Care Placement and Review Proceedings in Family Court, by the New York State Temp Comm to…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Foster Care Status of Lucinda G.New York Family Court · 1983
- Alpha S. v. KrauskopfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Foster Care Status of Shakiba P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re H. — M. ChildrenNew York City Family Court · 1992