Legal Opinion

Warner v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2001No. 00-27PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[¶1] Appellant Thomas Eugene Warner appeals his convictions and sentences for second degree sexual assault and indecent liberties with a minor, contending that constitutional speedy and fair trial violations, prosecutorial misconduct, and unfair sentencing require that we reverse his conviction and sentence. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] Warner states the issues as follows:

1. Did the trial court err in permitting the testimony of Dr. Shana Tubach, pediatrician, on the State's rebuttal, depriving Appellant of his constitutional right to a fair trial, and err…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Berry v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Talley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Gilbert Ortiz, Jr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API