Legal Opinion

Sentney v. Hutchinson Interurban Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 11, 1913No. 18,777PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Daniel A. Banta, judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The plaintiffs brought this action to enjoin the defendant from tearing up and removing a portion of its track. The state was made a party on *611the relation of the county attorney, but owing to the character, of the road in question it is not necessary to consider any matters touching the interests of the public, bub only those in which the original plaintiffs and defendant are concerned.

Early in May, 1908, the defendant was operating its road in Hutchinson from Main street east on Fourth to Lorraine street. Farther east certain additions had…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burt v. Maurer (In Re Maurer)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Doman Hunting & Fishing Ass'n v. DomanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  3. Hodes & Nauser, MDs v. StanekSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. Babbit v. Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  5. Linda R. Burt v. Kristy Ann MaurerUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API