Legal Opinion

State v. . Phifer

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the. case: It is conceded by the Attorney-General that counsel for the private prosecution went outside the record and overstepped the bounds in appealing to the jury to convict the defendant because others had been killed by drunken drivers on this same highway and no one had been punished for it: S. v. Evans, 183 N. C., 758, 111 S. E., 345.

In Washington v. State, 87 Ga., 133, 13 S. E., 131, the Supreme Court of Georgia held- that, on the trial of an indictment for arson, it was error to allow the solicitor-general, over objection of defendant’s counsel, to state,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Ferguson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. State v. . SwindellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Neal v. BrockhanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API