Legal Opinion
Claim of Marshall v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 26, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Lahtinen, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed April 24, 2000, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related disability and denied his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.
Claimant, an employee of Elf Atochem North America, Inc. (hereinafter the employer), alleged that he suffered a low back injury while lifting a 350-pound drum on October 24, 1995. Claimant missed the next two days of work and continued to miss time from work until May 7, 1996, when he stopped working for the employer as a result of his back problems. Claimant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Myers v. Eldor Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Baumgarten v. New York State Banking DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Marshall v. Murnane AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Ceselka v. Kingsborough Community CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Spoerl v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by8 opinions
- Claim of Depew v. Lancet Arch, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Phillips v. Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Curley v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Outerie v. Derle Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Hogencamp v. AmscamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.