Legal Opinion
Hogencamp v. Amscam
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 4, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMugglin, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed July 12, 2002, which ruled that claimant failed to provide his employer with adequate notice of his injury.
Claimant was working as a stock person on February 11, 2000 when he allegedly injured his back while pulling a skid weighing between 500 and 700 pounds. He went to the hospital the following day and was referred to physician Michael Kamalian, who examined him on February 14, 2000. Claimant was out of work until February 17, 2000. On March 27, 2001, he filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits, which was controverted…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claim of Marshall v. Elf Atochem North America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Claim of Oberson v. Bureau of Ferry Aviation & TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Ray v. Waldbaums, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Dempster v. United Parcel ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Miner v. Cayuga Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of Miller v. North Shore University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Baker v. E.J. Construction Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006