Legal Opinion
Jutila v. Frye
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1925No. 4641PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This was an aetion by a husband to recover damages re**609suiting from the death of his wife through the wrongful act and neglect of the defendant. The jury returned a verdict in tho sum of $1,500 in his favor, and the judgment has been brought here for review.
Section 6644 of the Idaho Compiled Statutes of 1919, provides:
“When the death of a person, not being a minor is caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another, his heirs or personal representatives may maintain an action for damages against the person causing tho death; or if such person be employed by another…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trask v. Boise King Placers Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
- Anthes v. AnthesIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
- Bonham National Bank of Fairbury v. Grimes Pass Placer Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by10 opinions
- Petition of Marina Mercante Nicaraguense, SADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Anglo California Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. LazardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Stamper v. BannisterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- Midland Valley R. Co. v. Excelsior Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Stafford v. FieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.