Legal Opinion
Wilde v. Wilde
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 10, 1962PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Herbert, J. S. C.
During earlier stages of this case Reuben P. Goldstein was attorney for the defendant, Elizabeth Ann Wilde. In an effort to collect an unpaid bill for legal services and disbursements he is now claiming an attorney’s lien, and for the purpose of collecting it is following the procedure suggested in H. & H. Ranch Homes, Inc. v. Smith, 54 N. J. Super. 347, 353 (App. Div. 1959). It will be obvious from the title which appears above that Mr. Gold-stein’s claim is being asserted in the same cause in which the services were rendered.
Initially Mr. Goldstein stated his position in an…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MacKall v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- In re the Estate of McCormickBergen County Surrogate's Court · 1936
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kasemer v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- The Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Steven M. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Industry Network v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Kasemer v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980