Legal Opinion
Emeldi v. University of Oregon
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2012No. 10-35551PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GOULD; Dissent by Judge FISHER.
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
In Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education, the Supreme Court held that retaliation by a federally funded educational institution against someone who complains of gender discrimination is actionable under Title IX. 544 U.S. 167, 171, 125 S.Ct. 1497, 161 L.Ed.2d 361 (2005). We must decide what a plaintiff must prove to prevail on a Title IX retaliation claim, and whether plaintiff Monica Emeldi adduced sufficient evidence of her claim to overcome summary judgment.
I
Monica Emeldi sued the University of Oregon, alleging…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- T.B. ex rel. Brenneise v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Emeldi v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Davis v. PowellDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
- Women Prisoners of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1994
- John Doe v. Jami SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.