State v. Moses
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentFinley, J.
(dissenting) — Although I must disagree with much of the reasoning and the result reached in the majority opinion, I certainly agree with its comment that the law of Indian treaties has suffered from a most disjointed and enigmatic development in published opinions of the courts on this most important subject. This fact of life makes careful and considered analysis of Indian treaty provisions all the more important when treaty provisions are at issue within the confines of a legal controversy. And, certainly, such an issue is present in the instant case.
The appellants herein stand charged and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- The Kansas IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.