Legal Opinion

Medvik v. Ollendorff

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1989No. 54792PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Judge.

This appeal is before us for the second time. See Medvik v. Ollendorff, 727 S.W.2d 473 (Mo.App.1987). Plaintiff, Stephen Medvik (Medvik), was discharged from employment as a mechanic for University City, Missouri (City). He was notified of his termination in a letter from Willie Norfleet (Norfleet), the City’s Director of Finance. Procedures established by the City allow an employee to appeal a disciplinary action to the City’s Civil Service Board (Board). The Board holds a hearing and makes a recommendation to the City Manager. The City Manager provides the last review at the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greene County Concerned Citizens v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Stephen Medvick v. City of University City, Missouri Frank Ollendorff, City Manager of University CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  3. Willard v. Red LobsterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Snyder v. Department of Elementary & Secondary EducationMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Kaufman v. St. Charles CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API