Shannonhouse v. . White
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Appeal by defendants from Justice, J., at January Term, 1915, of PERQUIMANS. Proceeding under tbe entry laws, whereby H. T. Sbannonbouse and another protested against an entry by T. S. "White and others. From the judgment White and others appeal.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendants from Justice, J., at January Term, 1915, of PERQUIMANS. Proceeding under tbe entry laws, whereby H. T. Sbannonbouse and another protested against an entry by T. S. "White and others. From the judgment White and others appeal. This is a proceeding under the entry laws, tried upon these issues: 1. Is the enterer entitled to entry of any of the water front in question? Answer: “Yes.” 2. If so, how many feet east of wooden stake in protestants’ western line, as claimed by protestants? Answer: “Eight feet.” From the judgment rendered, defendants, enterers, appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The defendants T. S. White and others laid an entry for wharf purposes, as prescribed by section 1696, Revisal of 1905, for a certain piece or parcel of land covered by the waters of Perquimans River, claiming that said land was adjacent to the front of a certain shore land which they owned. The plaintiffs, protestants, duly filed protest.
T. 0. Blanchard & Bro. originally owned a tract of land in the town of Hertford, extending from Grubb Street between parallel lines north-wardly to the Perquimans River. In 1906 said T. C. Blanchard & Bro. conveyed to the Supply and Development Company,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Webb v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Schurmeier v. St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Brisbine v. St. Paul & Sioux City RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Wilson v. . ForbesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1828
- Bainbridge v. SherlockIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MacE v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909