Legal Opinion

MacE v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 8, 1909PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Dissent · WalkerWalker, J.

These issues were submitted:

1. Was the plaintiff, J. M. Mace, wrongfully put off the defendant's train, as alleged in the complaint? Answer: Yes.

2. If so, was the expulsion of the plaintiff, J. M. Mace, malicious, wanton or accompanied with violence or rudeness and insult? Answer: No.

3. What damages, if any, is the plaintiff, J. M. Mace, entitled to recover? Answer: One hundred and fifty dollars.

The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court. The plaintiff purchased of defendant's agent, at Rock Hill, S.C., on 1 July,…

Also in this document: Dissent · Walker.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hallman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Norman v. East Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Shannonhouse v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  2. Hallman v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Norman v. East Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Sawyer v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Blaylock v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API