Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Schmidheiser

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 20, 1933No. Appeal 363PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

In the first assignment of error supporting this appeal by George A. Nahm from the judgment and sentence of the court below following his conviction, along with Harry A. Rau, upon an indictment returned to No. 1642, May Sessions, 1932, it is charged that the trial judge erred in consolidating for trial, over appellant’s protest, the above numbered indictment and certain indictments at Nos. 1643, 1649 and 1650, of the same term. If this assignment must be sustained, the additional ones need not be considered.

An examination of the record discloses that an indictment,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CauffielSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Commonwealth v. ValottaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Commonwealth v. DanaleczkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Commonwealth v. WheelerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. Commonwealth v. PortnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McCordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth v. DixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Commonwealth v. DauphineeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Commonwealth v. O'NeilSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. ReillySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API